|
KRUSKAL MEETS THE ARONSON STACK
BY DENNIS LOOMIS
(with some ideas by SIMON)
|
WRITTEN BY DENNIS
LOOMIS
On
page 45 of the recently released English version of Mnemonica
by Juan Tamariz,
there’s a trick called: “Prediction a La Kruskal.” It was devised by
Antonio Jose Arenillas specifically for Tamariz’ Mnemonica stack. I
wondered whether a similar effect could be done with the Aronson
Stack. After considerable investigation, I’m pleased to report that
it can. I worked this out shortly after getting my copy of
Mnemonica. When I shared it with Simon Aronson, he created a
brilliant addition which makes for an even stronger effect.
EFFECT
First, the
magician predicts a card. This can be a written prediction on a
piece of paper, a card from another deck in your pocket, or any
other prediction procedure you like.
Next, a spectator is asked to freely cut off a packet from the
deck. The cut off packet of cards is turned face up on the table,
revealing the card the spectator cut to. A counting process is
then performed starting at the place where the spectator freely
cut, and starting with the value of whatever card he cut to. This
process is continued, to move through the deck to a final card,
which turns out to match the prediction
THE KRUSKAL
COUNTING PROCEDURE
The
Kruskal count or process was named for Rutgers mathematician Martin
D. Kruskal. It was designed to be done with a shuffled deck, but
this meant that it would not be successful 100% of the time. By
using the Aronson Stack with the appropriate prediction card, we can
guarantee the success of our trick.
In the original
Kruskal procedure all the face cards were valued at five. In
Mnemonica, Arenillas and Tamariz changed the procedure for
the face cards. Instead of valuing them as five, they are spelled:
K-I-N-G, Q-U-E-E-N, or J-A-C-K. Thus, for example, if a Jack
appears, the spectator spells J-A-C-K, as four cards are dealt face
up. This spelling change makes more sense for the face cards, and
adds variation because not all face cards have the same number of
letters. In fact, my effect with the Aronson Stack will work with
either the original or this new spelling process, but the original
Kruskal procedure can leads to a disadvantageous situation which I
will explain later. So, I use the spelling procedure with the face
cards.
Let’s work through
an example, just to illustrate the Kruskal counting procedure. With
a deck in Aronson Stack order, let’s say when the spectator cuts off
his packet and turns it face up, the card cut to is the Ten of
Spades. Since the card is a Ten, the spectator counts and deals
(from the balance of the pack) ten cards face up onto the Ten of
Spades, arriving at the Queen of Diamonds. Since a face card was
reached, the spectator spells “Queen” (dealing five more cards, one
for each letter) and arrives at the Queen of Hearts. Since it’s
another face card, the spelling process is repeated and “Queen” is
spelled again, arriving at the Four of Diamonds. Since this is a
spot card, its value is used, so four cards are then dealt, which
brings us to the Ten of Clubs. Continuing this procedure through
the deck we will arrive at the Four of Clubs, and then the Six of
Diamonds. Since there are only three cards remaining, the count can
go no further, and the Six of Diamonds becomes the “selected” card.
This counting
procedure appears quite random, since the cards do not appear to be
in any order and the starting point was determined by the
spectator’s random cut.
WORKING
I discovered that,
if the Aronson stack is given one cut, then the procedure will work
all the time. This allows us to create a strong prediction routine.
You need only do
two things, and the trick is virtually self working. First, with the
deck in Aronson stack order, you must cut the Five of Diamonds to
the face before starting. Second, the spectator’s initial cut must
be restricted slightly: his cut must be within any of the top 24
cards. Note that this is a broad range of permissible cuts, so the
leeway is eminently practical. In discussing this with Simon
Aronson, he suggested the following patter to explain your limiting
instruction: “This is a counting trick. We’ll count down a random
number, using whatever number you cut to. So cut off less than half
the deck so that we have some cards left in which to do the
counting.”
Your prediction
will be the Queen of Hearts. Note that, once the Aronson stack has
been cut as above, the Queen of Hearts will be the second card from
the bottom of the deck. You can of course predict the Queen of
Hearts in any way you want. For the past few days, I’ve been
carrying a Queen of Hearts from another deck in one pocket so that I
can do this trick. I simply pull the card out, with its back to the
audience, and place it somewhere in view. It’s also fortunate that
the Queen of Hearts is the card that works with the Aronson Stack,
because this a card often named by laymen.
Just follow the
procedure outlined above, spelling the court cards and counting the
values of the others, and regardless of where the spectator makes
his initial cut (among the top 24 cards) your path will always lead
to the Queen of Hearts.
For completeness,
at the end of this write-up is a chart showing the various paths
taken for a cut from any of the top 24 cards, but you don’t need to
memorize (or even know) these, since the trick works automatically.
COMMENTS
1. The trick will
also work if the Queen of Hearts is cut to the bottom, but then the
counting and spelling procedure will proceed to the very last card.
I think it looks better to have one card left on the table.
2. If you use the
original Kruskal count procedure of valuing the face cards as “5,”
the trick will work. However, in some paths, you will arrive at the
King of Spades, the Queen of Spades, the Jack of Spades, the Ace of
Spades, and the Ten of Spades. This is because of one of the poker
deals built into the Aronson Stack. This suggests a stack. So, I
prefer to avoid it by using the procedure of spelling the face cards
worked out by Arenillas and Tamariz.
3. The initial cut
can go quite a bit deeper. With one exception, all of the cards up
to the Six of Clubs will work. That’s the top 33 cards of the deck
once you’ve cut the Five of Diamonds to the face. However, there is
one exception: it will not work with the 9 of Diamonds. I recommend
using Simon Aronson’s patter given above, and if they do cut a
little deep, have them turn the packet face up. If you see a card
anywhere in the range of stack numbers from 28 to 51 or 1 to 8 you
are fine. If, however, you see card 52 (Nine of Diamonds) you react
by saying: “I think that’s a little deep, will you cut a few less
cards?” Then you replace the packet and have the spectator cut
again. This should seldom happen as Simon’s patter virtually ensures
that the cut will fall into the totally safe area of the top 24
cards.
4. If you like to
‘Jazz’ with the Aronson stack, this trick makes an excellent
addition to your arsenal. Since the Queen of Hearts is frequently
named, just go into this trick when it is. You will have to cut the
Five of Diamonds to the face, of course.
5. If you are
proficient at ‘Jazzin’ with the Aronson stack, you can eliminate any
restrictions on the cut at all. If the cut falls in the safe area of
the top 24 cards, you continue with this trick. You can even do so
if they should cut into the eight card block immediately below the
Nine of Diamonds. (Just remember that these are stack numbers one to
eight.) But, if the cut falls on the Nine of Diamonds, or below the
Six of clubs, you simply do not do this trick. Just revert to your
normal ‘Jazzin’ procedures.
6. The reason that
the Kruskal count works well with the Queen of Hearts as the target
is that there are two cards which lead directly to the Queen (The
Seven of Spades, and the Queen of Diamonds.) And, the paths which
lead to those two cards are mutually exclusive. If you look on the
chart at the path from the top card of the deck (the Seven of
Clubs,) and the path from the second card from the top, you’ll see
that they’re completely different. No cards appear in both of those
paths. Any card which begins a path which crosses either of those
two paths will lead inexorably to the Queen of Hearts. Fortunately,
with the Aronson stack, the next twenty two cards all do this.
7. In Mnemonica, Arenillas and Tamariz give their method for
repeating the effect. This can easily be done with this version.
After you complete the effect, replace the Queen of Hearts on the
bottom of the deck. You can then repeat the entire routine, with the
Five of Diamonds as your prediction. In fact, you can use any of the
following cards which are near the bottom of the deck: Ace of
Hearts, Eight of Spades, Three of Diamonds, Seven of Hearts, and
Five of Diamonds. Just return the Queen of Hearts to the bottom of
the deck, and slip the card of your choice from the above list to
the fifty-first position, and you are set.
THE ARONSON
“SELECTION” VARIATION
I told
Simon Aronson about my discovery of how to do “Prediction a la
Kruskal” with the Aronson stack. A couple of days later, he had
worked out this brilliant variation. In Simon’s version, the Kruskal
procedure will lead to a card previously selected by another
spectator!
Begin
with the deck in Aronson Stack order. Spread the stacked deck for a
selection and removal. The selection must come from the lower half
of the deck. Actually, it must fall from the 28th card to
the 50th card. This is not difficult. Simply begin
spreading cards from left to right with your left thumb as you begin
to ask the spectator to take a card. Move quickly, and by the time
he can respond, you have passed the first 28 cards or so. Then, slow
down and let them choose a card as it goes by. Don’t let them pick
either the bottom card or the one adjacent to it.
Have
the spectator show the card to the other spectators, and as he does
so, get a break between the 7H and the QH. Simon works with the 5D
as a short card, so it’s easy in his case to catch a break one card
up from his short card. He suggests that you may also want to pencil
dot the Seven or Queen to facilitate this. You could put “punch”
work into one of those cards as well.
After
the spectator has shown the card around, split the deck at the break
to have the selection returned. Obtain a new break two cards down.
This is very easy to sight count.
Now
double undercut to your break. The 5D will become the face card of
the deck, and the selection will be two cards above it. Now proceed
with the Kruskal procedure outlined above, and your final card will
be the selection! As Simon said: “This opens up the possibilities
greatly.”
When
the effect concludes, you need only replace the selection in its
proper position and your Aronson Stack is intact.
DENNIS’ COMMENTS
ON SIMON’S ADDITION
1. Here's an
alternative procedure I worked out for the selection process: Begin
by cutting the Five of Diamonds to the face. Have someone just touch
any card they like as you thumb cards slowly into the right hand.
(They must touch one of the top 23 cards.) Break the deck below the
card they touch and tip up the cards in the right hand to show them
their selection on the face. You do NOT square up those cards. As
you replace the spread cards in your right hand onto the cards in
your left, Hofzinser cull the chosen card. The way you’re holding
the cards makes this quite easy. As you close the fan, slip the
culled chosen card between the 7H and QH. (The
next-to-the-bottom-card and the one above it.) Now false shuffle
and/or cut and you are ready to proceed with the Kruskal Count.
2. You can create
a similar effect using a procedure from Mnemonica.
Begin by forcing the Queen of Hearts from a different deck. Have the
card tabled but not revealed until the end of the effect.
You could use a
gaffed forcing deck, like a one-way deck, Svengali Deck, etc. Or,
you can use a sleight of hand force. If your force is deceptive, you
create about the same effect as with Simon’s addition.
3. Here’s the
chart, showing each of the possible paths:
|
1 |
7C |
10C |
4C |
6D |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
2 |
4H |
JC |
4S |
2S |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
3 |
KH |
JH |
10H |
QS |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
4 |
4D |
10C |
4C |
6D |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
5 |
10D |
9H |
2C |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
JC |
4S |
2S |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
7 |
JH |
10H |
QS |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
10C |
4C |
6D |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
JD |
3C |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
10 |
4S |
2S |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
11 |
10H |
QS |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
6H |
4C |
6D |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
3C |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
|
14 |
2S |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
|
15 |
9H |
2C |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
KS |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
6S |
QC |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
4C |
6D |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
19 |
8H |
KC |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
20 |
9C |
2H |
AS |
3H |
AC |
10S |
QD |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
QS |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
22 |
6D |
5C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23 |
QC |
5C |
6C |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
2C |
JS |
9S |
KD |
AD |
7S |
QH |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|